Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
R.Mohanbabu – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General of Registration – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions seek mandamus for document registration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no legal bar; decision on registration required. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. direct decision within 4 weeks with speaking order. (Para 5 , 6) |
COMMON ORDER
These Writ Petitions have been filed to direct the respondents 1 to
3 to register the pending documents bearing Doc.Nos.263 and 262 of
2021, both dated 20.11.2021 on the file of the 3rd respondent.
2. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse order is passed against the respondents 4 and 5 in these writ petitions, notice to the respondents 4 and 5 is dispensed with by this Court.
3. The petitioners categorically state that there is no legal impediment for the 3rd respondent to register the aforesaid pending documents, namely Doc.Nos.263 and 262 of 2021, both dated 20.11.2021. According to the petitioners, despite the same, till date, the aforesaid two documents have not been registered by the 3rd respondent.
4. Admittedly, till date, the 3rd respondent has not taken a final decision as to whether the said pending documents can be registered or not. Necessarily, a decision has to be ta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
