Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Suresh Kumar, Shamim Ahmed, JJ
The Chairman Chennai Port Authority – Appellant
Versus
K.S.Saravanan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of employee's superannuation before increment date. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. hearing of counsel arguments. (Para 4) |
| 3. increment accrues for prior year service. (Para 5) |
| 4. appeal dismissed, upholding writ order. (Para 6) |
This intra-Court appeal has been directed against the order passed by the Writ Court dated 13.03.2025 made in W.P.No.18002 of 2024.
2. The respondent/writ petitioner was an employee and every year, the annual increment would be given from 01.03. Like that, whether he would be entitled to get such annual increment, which falls on 01.03.2024 or not was the question.
3. The reason being that, on the previous date, that is on 29.02.2024, the respondent/writ petitioner superannuated and retired and since the annual increment date falls on the next date, that is on 01.03.2025, such increment since has been denied, against which, he filed the said writ petition, which was allowed by the learned Writ Court through the order impugned.
4. We have heard Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, assisted by Mr.Arun Dhanapalan, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.K.C.Karl Marx, learned counsel for the respondent/writ petitioner.
5. Since t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
