J U D G M E N T

Heard.

2.The Petitioner is a software company a a subsidiary of Cognizant Technology Solutions Inc., based in New Jersey, United ates of America. In the present writ petition, the Petitioner challenges the order dated 18.10.2019 passed by the 1 Respoent, the Appellate Authority uer the Tamil Nadu Shops a Eablishments Act, 1947, in proceedings bearing TSE-1/1 of 2016.

3.The Appellate Authority (1 Respoent), by her well-considered order dated 18.10.2019, finally passed the following order:—

“Issue No.6 : To what remedy the appellant is entitled to.

153. In fine, in view of extensive discussions on various issues, the Authority holds that the dispensing with the services of the appellant by the respoent-management is that i) the termination of services of the appellant was not for reasonable cause, ii) that the respoent has not satisfied the Appellate Authority as to the subjective satisfaction based on which the appellant was terminated from service based on documents a evidence, iii) that the termination of service of the appellant is not “termination simpliciter” but one of “punitive” in nature, iv) since the termination of service ca igma, the respoent-management, befor