Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
M/s. Happy Ventures Rep. by its Partner. Ranjani – Appellant
Versus
The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Office, No.43, Municipal Office Road, Virudhunagar - 626 001. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks removal of seal for retrieving tenant belongings from premises on water body. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner highlights business hardship due to locked materials. (Para 5) |
| 3. court grants conditional permission to remove items, mandates re-sealing. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Mr. N.M.M. Abishek Pandian, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent. Notice to the second respondent is dispensed with.
2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction to the first respondent to remove the seal and unlock the premises bearing Survey T.S. No. 360, Block No. 7, Door No. 18, Railway Feeder Road, Virudhunagar – 626 001. The petitioner claims to be a tenant of the said premises, which has been sealed on the ground that the construction was put up on a water body.
3. The second respondent is the owner of the premises. The petitioner, however, confines his relief to seeking permission to remove his materials and belongings from the premises.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.
5. The petitioner submits that he is unable to commence a new restaurant business, as all the materials required for the same are lying inside the sealed pre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
