Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.Kumarappan, J
Arthi Kamlesh Purohit – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Sri Vimala Nehru Exports Private Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment details and background of the case. (Para 1) |
| 2. parties have reached a compromise. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court permits compounding of the offence. (Para 4) |
ORDER
The petitioner has preferred the present revision challenging the judgment dated 02.02.2026 passed in C.A.No.157 of 2021 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode, confirming the conviction and sentence originally imposed on the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the judgment dated 07.10.2021 in S.T.C.No.695 of 2018 by the Fast Track Court No.II (Magisterial Level), Erode. The petitioner was sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment and directed to pay Rs.08,01,990/- to the complainant as compensation and in default to undergo further one month simple imprisonment.
2. Mr.C.S.Saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the parties have since arrived at an amicable settlement and have filed Memo of Compromise dated 18.03.2026 before this Court.
3. The respondent/complainant appeared through video conferencing mode and affirmed the same. The parties stated that the dispute has been fully settled and accord
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
