Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
J.Carmel Mary – Appellant
Versus
Mrs.Byalobai The Tahsildar – Respondent
Cont P(MD)No.259 of 2026 in W.P(MD)No.2923 of 2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel submits compliance via representation consideration and order. (Para 1) |
| 2. court records compliance and closes contempt petition. (Para 2) |
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel taking notice of the respondents, would submit that the direction in the writ petition was to consider the petitioners' representation and to pass orders. The same was considered and the order was passed on 22.04.2022, and as a matter of fact, an appeal was also preferred by the petitioners in the contempt petition, which is also disposed of by proceedings dated
14.05.2024.
2.In view of the same, recording the compliance of the order and giving liberty to the petitioner to take such steps as against the said orders in the manner known to law. The contempt petition stands closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
