SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26613

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ
K.Elangovan – Appellant
Versus
S.Saravanakumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.G.Kannan
For the Contemnors: Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Addl. Government Pleader for R2 &R3., Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu for R1.

Table of Content
1. alleged non-compliance with division bench order. (Para 2)
2. merger doctrine inapplicable; close petition, permit fresh filing. (Para 3)

(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.The petitioner alleges that the order dated 15.09.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD)No.1297 of 2022 has not been complied with and hence, this contempt petition has been filed.

3.It is seen that the Hon'ble Division Bench had confirmed the order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.(MD)No.4103 of 2014 on 19.05.2022. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a recent decision reported in 2026 INSC 204 (United Labour Federation vs Gagandeep Singh Bedi) has held that the doctrine of merger will not apply to contempt proceedings where the order of the learned Single Judge has been confirmed by the Division Bench. Therefore, we close the present contempt petition and grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh contempt petition. The same shall be listed before the learned Single Judge concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top