IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ
K.Elangovan – Appellant
Versus
S.Saravanakumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. alleged non-compliance with division bench order. (Para 2) |
| 2. merger doctrine inapplicable; close petition, permit fresh filing. (Para 3) |
(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2.The petitioner alleges that the order dated 15.09.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD)No.1297 of 2022 has not been complied with and hence, this contempt petition has been filed.
3.It is seen that the Hon'ble Division Bench had confirmed the order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.(MD)No.4103 of 2014 on 19.05.2022. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a recent decision reported in 2026 INSC 204 (United Labour Federation vs Gagandeep Singh Bedi) has held that the doctrine of merger will not apply to contempt proceedings where the order of the learned Single Judge has been confirmed by the Division Bench. Therefore, we close the present contempt petition and grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh contempt petition. The same shall be listed before the learned Single Judge concerned.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.