SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26613

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ
K.Elangovan – Appellant
Versus
S.Saravanakumar – Respondent
Cont.P.(MD)No.819 of 2026 in W.A.(MD)No.1297 of 2022 | W.P.(MD)No.4103 of 2014



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.G.Kannan
For the Contemnors: Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Addl. Government Pleader for R2 &R3., Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu for R1.

Doctrine of merger does not apply to contempt proceedings when Single Judge order confirmed by Division Bench.

Headnote:The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 governs proceedings for willful disobedience of court orders. Petitioner alleges non-compliance with the Division Bench order dated 15.09.2025 in W.A.(MD)No.1297 of 2022, which confirmed the Single Judge order dated 19.05.2022 in W.P.(MD)No.4103 of 2014. Court notes the Supreme Court's ruling in 2026 INSC 204 holding that the doctrine of merger does not apply to contempt proceedings when a Single Judge order is confirmed by Division Bench. Issue framed: Whether contempt petition is maintainable post Division Bench confirmation. Ratio: Doctrine of merger inapplicable per Supreme Court; fresh contempt petition to be filed before Single Judge. Contempt petition closed with liberty to file fresh petition before Single Judge.

Table of Content
1. alleged non-compliance with division bench order. (Para 2)
2. merger doctrine inapplicable; close petition, permit fresh filing. (Para 3)

(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.The petitioner alleges that the order dated 15.09.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD)No.1297 of 2022 has not been complied with and hence, this contempt petition has been filed.

3.It is seen that the Hon'ble Division Bench had confirmed the order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.(MD)No.4103 of 2014 on 19.05.2022. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a recent decision reported in 2026 INSC 204 (United Labour Federation vs Gagandeep Singh Bedi) has held that the doctrine of merger will not apply to contempt proceedings where the order of the learned Single Judge has been confirmed by the Division Bench. Therefore, we close the present contempt petition and grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh contempt petition. The same shall be listed before the learned Single Judge concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top