SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26666

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Annamalai Arvind Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
Meenu Kalaiarasan – Respondent
CRP No. 4497 of 2025 | CMP Nos.22891 and 22892 of 2025



Advocates:
For Petitioner(s): Maj.Divya D.
For Respondent(s): MR.G.Murugendran

Interim maintenance order upheld as just and reasonable based on husband's income despite wife's business.

Headnote:Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the High Court reviewed an order for interim maintenance in matrimonial proceedings. The husband challenged the trial court's direction to pay Rs.30,000 per month, claiming the wife had sufficient income from her business. The court examined the parties' financial positions, noting the husband's sale of property exceeding Rs.1 crore and the wife's business turnover. The trial court's order was found just and reasonable based on the husband's income. The key issue was whether the interim maintenance amount required interference, given the parties' incomes and the disposal of the main petition. The court upheld the order, considering it equitable and non-excessive, as the main matrimonial petition had been disposed of post-order. The civil revision petition is dismissed; the husband is directed to pay arrears of Rs.3,00,000 within eight weeks.

Table of Content
1. interim maintenance ordered pending matrimonial petition disposal. (Para 1)
2. parties contest incomes and personal allegations. (Para 2 , 3 , 6)
3. court assesses incomes and upholds maintenance quantum. (Para 4 , 7)
4. revision dismissed with directions for payment. (Para 8)

ORDER

Challenging the impugned order passed in IA No.2 of 2024 in HMOP No.201 of 2023 directing the petitioner/husband to pay a sum of Rs.30,000/- per month as interim maintenance till the disposal of HMOP No.201 of

2023, the husband has filed the above revision.

2. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the respondent/wife is having sufficient source of income and she is doing online sarees business under the name and style of “Shubam Sarees” and her turn over comes to more than Rs.1,00,00,000/- and without considering these facts, the trial Judge has awarded a sum of Rs.30,000/- per month as interim maintenance which is liable to be dismissed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent/wife submits that the revision petitioner is having sufficient source of income and he has both movable and immovable properties and he sold the property of more than Rs.1,00,00,000/- in the year 2021 and the trial Court has rightly fixed Rs.30,000/-per month as interim maintenance which does not require any interference.

4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

5. The main HMOP No.201 of 2023 was disposed of on 28.11.2025.

Pending HMOP No.201 of 2023, the trial Judge has ordered interim maintenance of Rs.30,000/-per month to be paid to the respondent/wife till the disposal of HMOP No.201/2023. Now as on date, it comes around Rs.3,00,000/-(Rupees Three Lakhs Only) as arrears.

6. However, learned counsel for the respondent raised an objection stating that the ground sought for by the revision petitioner is scandalous one that the respondent/wife is having extra marital relationship. However, the respondent/wife admits that they got separated and they have no issues out of wedlock.

7. As on date, considering the income of the revision petitioner, the trial Judge has fixed a sum of Rs.30,000/-(Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) per month which appears to be just and reasonable and does not warrant any interference and the main HMOP No.201 of 2023 was also disposed of on

28.11.2025.

T.V.THAMILSELVI.,J sr

8. Therefore, the civil revision petition is dismissed. The revision petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.30,000/-(Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) to the respondent/wife till the date of the disposal of HMOP No.201 of 2023. The revision petitioner is directed to comply with the order passed by this Court within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Liberty is granted to both the parties to challenge the findings rendered by the trial Court in HMOP No.201 of 2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top