Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
The State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
The Correspondent – Respondent
W.A(MD)No.392 of 2026|C.M.P(MD)No.3654 of 2026|W.P(MD)No.4209 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal challenges single judge writ order. (Para 1) |
| 2. compliance with order submitted. (Para 2) |
| 3. appeal dismissed as infructuous. (Para 3) |
[Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
The present writ appeal has been filed by the respondents, as appellants, challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P(MD)No.4209 of 2025 dated 11.09.2025, whereby the writ petition was disposed of.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants submitted that the order of the learned Single Judge has been complied with vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1972/A1/2023 dated 18.02.2026.
3.Recording the said submission, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ appeal. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
