SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26709

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.Subramaniam, K.Surender, JJ
K.Kala – Appellant
Versus
The Executive Engineer, Zone – VIII, Greater Chenani Corporation – Respondent
W.P.No.10260 of 2023|WMP.Nos.10418 & 10422 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.D.Sathiyaseelan
For the Respondents: Mrs.S.B.Nirmalatha for Mr.N.R.Ramesh Kanna, Standing Counsel for R1, Mr.B.Balaji, Standing Counsel for R2, Mr.T.Arunkumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R3

Writ challenging show cause notice for encroachment not maintainable; petitioners must submit explanation for authority's consideration before eviction.

Headnote:The petitioners challenged a show cause notice issued under proceedings dated 17.03.2023 concerning land classified as GramaNatham House Site. The court found that a show cause notice does not warrant writ intervention, requiring petitioners to submit explanations for consideration before eviction proceedings. Article 226 invoked for certiorarified mandamus. Issue framed: Whether writ petition challenging show cause notice is maintainable. Ratio: Petitioners must respond to notice with documents; authorities to decide post-consideration and follow eviction procedures for encroachments. Writ petition dismissed; petitioners at liberty to submit explanation within 10 days; final decision and eviction, if applicable, within 12 weeks.

Table of Content
1. challenge to show cause notice on encroachment. (Para 1)
2. show cause notice requires petitioner response. (Para 2)
3. dismiss writ; direct explanation and timely eviction decision. (Para 3)

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.,)

The show cause notice issued by the competent Authority of Chennai Corporation dated 17.03.2023 is under challenge in the present Writ proceedings.

2. The show cause notice would provide no cause for institution of Writ proceedings. The petitioners on receipt of notice are at liberty to submit their explanation along with documents, if any. On receipt of any such explanation, the respondents have to consider the same and thereafter take a final decision and proceed with the enforcement action for removal of encroachments. The procedures as contemplated for eviction of encroachments are to be followed.

3. In the present case, since the Writ Petition has been instituted challenging the show cause notice, this Court is not inclined to entertain the Writ petition. However, the petitioners are at liberty to submit their explanation within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if any, explanation is received, the same shall be considered by the Authorities and thereafter a final decision is to be taken. If any encroachments are identified, they shall proceed with the eviction of encroachments. The entire exercise is directed to be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top