SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26751

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
K.Hariharan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department – Respondent
W.M.P.Nos.42873 and 42874 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.L.Sudarsanam
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader (HR & CE)

Writ petition challenging temple fit person appointment not maintainable without prior civil court title adjudication under HR&CE Act sections 63(a)/(b).

Headnote:Under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, sections 63(a) and 63(b) govern determination of trusteeship for religious institutions. Petitioner, heading a registered society, maintained temple lands and rituals, claiming possession via revenue records amid encroachments. Court found writ petition premature without prior civil adjudication of title. Issues framed as maintainability of direct challenge to fit person appointment without exhausting statutory remedies under sections 63(a)/(b). Ratio: Title disputes must precede writ jurisdiction; society formation does not confer proprietary rights over temple property. Writ petition dismissed, liberty granted to approach civil court or authority for hereditary trustee remedy.

Table of Content
1. petition challenges temple thakkar appointment amid encroachments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. society maintenance insufficient for title; requires civil adjudication. (Para 4)
3. writ dismissed; pursue statutory remedies for trustee claim. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.42873 and 42874 of 2024 K.Hariharan .. Petitioner Versus

1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.

2. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department, A.K.Thangavelar Street, Near Rangaswamy Kulam, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District - 631 501.

3. The Assistant Commissioner, (Addl.I/c), Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department, Collector Office Campus, Kancheepuram District - 631 501.

4. The Thakkar/Executive Officer, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department, A/m. Vazhakaruthiswarar Thirukovil, Gandhi Road, Kancheepuram Town, Kancheepuram Taluk, Kancheepuram District - 631 501. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records from the 3rd respondent and quashing the impugned appointment order, dated 06.09.2024 vide his proceedings in br/K/e/f/vz;/4629/2010/m3 passed by the 3rd respondent by appointing the Executive Officer, A/m.Vazhakaruthiswarar Thirukovil, Kancheepuram as “Thakkar” in respect of subject temple “Arulmigu Valamburi Vinayagar Thirukoil” situated at Walajabad town, Walajabad taluk, Kancheepuram district – 631

605 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.L.Sudarsanam For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader (HR & CE)

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order, dated

06.09.2024 passed by the third respondent appointing the Executive Officer, A/m.Vazhakaruthiswarar Thirukovil, Kancheepuram as “Thakkar” in respect of subject temple “Arulmigu Valamburi Vinayagar Thirukoil” situated at Walajabad town, Walajabad taluk, Kancheepuram district – 631

605, to quash the same.

2. It is the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner is the President of Arulmigu Valamburi Vinayagar Aalaiya Thirupani Mandram situated at Walajabad town. The said Thirupani Mandram is registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. The petitioner, as the President of the temple, had formed the Mandram and has been maintaining proper accounts and ledger appropriately till date and the said Mandram is performing nithya poojas and other rituals. The lands comprised in Survey No.257 measuring 3.13 acres have been owned and possessed by the said temple and the same was entered in the A-Register and the village accounts.

3. While so, some third parties have entered the said temple without the knowledge and consent of the temple authorities namely, the petitioner. With regard to the said encroachment, the petitioner lodged a complaint with the concerned authority, which was forwarded to the Tahsildar, Walajabad. However, the same was forwarded to the third respondent, HR & CE Department. The third respondent sent a communication to the petitioner that the said temple does not come under the control of the HR & CE Department. In view of the above, the third respondent had arbitrarily appointed the fourth respondent as Thakkar (Fit Person) to the temple. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition is filed.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that more than a decade, the petitioner is maintaining the temple by performing the rituals and thereby, the respondents sent a notice to the petitioner by intimating the appointment of the Fit Person to the temple. However, the fit person is appointed without providing an opportunity to the petitioner. When the petitioner is in the helm of office, for the very same person, appointing the Fit Person is illegal. Accordingly, he prays for appropriate orders.

5. Per contra, learned Additional Government Pleader

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top