IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, R.Poornima, JJ
P.Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector / cum District High Level Monitoring Committee, Trichy, Trichy District – Respondent
W.P(MD) No.13345 of 2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner alleges encroachment on cart track, confirmed by tahsildar. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. direct removal of encroachment and cancel patta if granted. (Para 3) |
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)
The writ petitioner is a resident of Thachankurichi Village. She alleges that the 6th respondent had committed encroachment on a cart track.
2. The counter affidavit filed by the Tahsildar, Lalgudi confirms this allegation. It is further stated that notice under Section 7 of the Land encroachment Act was already issued to the 6th respondent on
18/12/2025.
3. We direct the third respondent to take consequential action. If the authority is satisfied that a cart track has been encroached, it shall be removed by adopting due process of law. Patta cannot be granted in respect of a street or a cart track. If any such patta has been granted, it has to necessarily be cancelled after giving notice. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.