SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ
Jothilakshm – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Gokul
For the Respondents: Mr.C.Ramar, Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2, Mr.Kannan for R3

Table of Content
1. encroachment notice on cart track upheld. (Para 2)
2. alternative site granted; petition dismissed. (Para 3)

The writ petitioner challenges the notice dated 9.11.2017 issued by the Commissioner, Rameshwaram Municipality, calling upon the petitioner to remove the encroachment committed by her in Survey no. 218/1.

2. Admittedly, as per the revenue record, Survey No. 218/1 has been classified as “cart track”. It is well settled that on a cart track, there cannot be any encroachment.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent states that the petitioner has been granted alternative site in Survey number 218/122 to an extent of 0.00.60 hac. It is for the petitioner to move to the alternate site as expeditiously as possible. 4. Granting two months time to the petitioner to vacate and remove the encroachment, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top