IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, R.POORNIMA, JJ
Jothilakshm – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. encroachment notice on cart track upheld. (Para 2) |
| 2. alternative site granted; petition dismissed. (Para 3) |
The writ petitioner challenges the notice dated 9.11.2017 issued by the Commissioner, Rameshwaram Municipality, calling upon the petitioner to remove the encroachment committed by her in Survey no. 218/1.
2. Admittedly, as per the revenue record, Survey No. 218/1 has been classified as “cart track”. It is well settled that on a cart track, there cannot be any encroachment.
3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent states that the petitioner has been granted alternative site in Survey number 218/122 to an extent of 0.00.60 hac. It is for the petitioner to move to the alternate site as expeditiously as possible. 4. Granting two months time to the petitioner to vacate and remove the encroachment, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.