Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
J.Shunmugaraja – Appellant
Versus
Madurai Kamaraj University, Rep. by its Registrar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges suspension post-arrest, reviewed but continued pending enquiry. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. prior reviews rejected reinstatement; new enquiry committee formed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court declines interference given reviews and pending enquiry. (Para 6) |
| 4. prolonged suspension harmful; mandates 12-week enquiry timeline or reinstatement. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
The writ petition has been filed seeking writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the Memo No.MKU/Estt-IV/2023 dated 03.04.2023 issued by the respondent University placing the petitioner under suspension.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Through the impugned proceedings, the petitioner was placed under suspension, as the petitioner was arrested in a criminal case. However, subsequently the said suspension was reviewed by the respondent University and an order was passed vide proceedings dated 27.09.2023 and the request of the petitioner to reinstate him into service was negatived on the ground that the charge memo dated 13.09.2023 was already issued and the same is pending for enquiry. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner, though,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
