SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26904

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
M/s.HDFC Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police, CCB-I, Egmore, Chennai. – Respondent
Crl.R.C.No.2230 of 2025|Crl.R.C.No.1659 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.G.Madhuvaneswaran for M/s.Dass And Viswa Associates, Mr.M.Vimal Bobby Crimson
For the Respondents:Mr.R.Kishore Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Criminal revisions dismissed/withdrawn post-party settlement before Judge Commissioner.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 442) governs criminal revision petitions challenging magistrate's order returning vehicles to de facto complainant instead of lien holder bank under loan agreement in cheating case (Crime No.214/2024). Petitioners sought records to set aside order dated 16.05.2025. Court noted parties settled disputes before Judge Commissioner. Second Paragraph: Issues framed as challenge to magistrate's direction on vehicle release. Ratio: Settlement before commissioner resolves disputes, permitting withdrawal and disposal per settlement terms. Third Paragraph: One revision dismissed as withdrawn; other disposed in terms of settlement report.

Table of Content
1. challenges magistrate's vehicle release order. (Para 1)
2. cases closed via settlement and withdrawal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

COMMON ORDER

These Criminal Revision Cases have been filed under Section 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the entire records relating to the order dated 16.05.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.4480 of 2025 in Crime No.214 of 2024 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB and CBCID Metro Cases, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008, and to set aside the same, and consequently to direct the return of the vehicles to the petitioner Bank in accordance with the loan agreement.

2. When the matters were taken up for hearing, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the parties have entered into an agreement before the learned Judge Commissioner, and the issues between the parties have already been settled. In pursuance of the said settlement, the petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.2230 of 2025 has made an endorsement seeking permission to withdraw the said revision, based on the letter given by the Judge Commissioner dated 09.02.2026.

3. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Crl.R.C.No.2230 of 2025, the same is dismissed as withdrawn.

C.KUMARAPPAN J.

4. Insofar as Crl.R.C.No.1659 of 2025 is concerned, in view of the settlement and the report filed by the learned Judge Commissioner, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of in terms of the report of the learned Judge Commissioner. The report of the learned Judge Commissioner shall form part and parcel of this order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top