Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
S.Hameed Ismail – Appellant
Versus
Paramanandham – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary eviction petition filed due to no rental agreement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. tenant seeks cross-examination on undisclosed property sale. (Para 3) |
| 3. discretionary denial of cross-examination upheld in summary proceedings. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned Order passed by the Rent Control Court in M.P.No.4 of 2025 in RLTOP.No.339 of 2025, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner.
2. The respondent/landlord has filed the petition before the Rent Court for eviction of the petitioner /tenant on the ground that there is no rental agreement in force between the parties and that the landlord has already issued a final termination notice as per law. When the above petition is pending, the petitioner/tenant has filed a petition to re-open the evidence on the side of the respondent/landlord to cross examine the witness on the side of the respondent/landlord. The said petition has been dismissed by the Rent Controller. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has preferred the present revision petition.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is having valid defence, but the trial Court failed to give
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
