IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
Chandraprakasmlu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trial court dismissed cross-examination petition due to established tenancy via rent deposits. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner argued for cross-examination on landlord's locus standi. (Para 3) |
| 3. bank statements prove jural relationship; revision dismissed, trial expedited. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed in M.P.No.3 of 2025 in RLTOP No.435 of 2025 by the learned X Court of Small Causes at Chennai, the Revision Petitioner/petitioner preferred this Civil Revision Petition.
2. Before the trial court, the Revision Petitioner filed the petition under Sec.36(2) of TNRRRLT Act, 2017 and r/w 151 of C.P.C., to permit him to cross-examine the landlord with regard to payment of rent and other connected aspects. The said petition was submitted by revision petitioner/tenant stating that already he had paid the rents to the bank account of respondent/landlord. To that effect, he produced bank statement. On considering both side submissions, the trial judge has held that as a coowner, he filed the petition for eviction as there is no rental agreement as mandated under the Act. Admittedly, the revision petitioner is the tenant and the bank statement also reveals that th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.