Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. Lakshminarayanan, J
P.Raja – Appellant
Versus
P.Karunanidhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of suit and limited revision scope. (Para 2 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. parties' contentions on commission report. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. mandatory objections before re-issuance. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. delay and litigant vigilance required. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. dismissal with cross-exam directions. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition challenges the order passed by the learned District Munsif, Melur, in I.A.No. 12 of 2026 in O.S.No.254 of
2009 dated 12.02.2026.
2. O.S.No. 254 of 2009 is a suit for declaration and consequential relief of injunction with respect to the suit schedule mentioned property. The defendants were served with summons. They have filed their written statement. Evidence has been completed. It is stated that the plaintiffs also made submissions in the suit. At that stage, the 13th defendant, who was impleaded pending the suit in I.A.No.1172 of 2017 dated 23.08.2017 took out an application in I.A.No.12 of 2026, for issuance of summons to the Advocate Commissioner. The said application came to be dismissed on 12.02.2026. Hence, the revision.
3. I heard Mr.Ponniah, for the civil revision petitioner and Mr.T.K.Gopalan, for the first respondent/contes
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
