SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26940

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
P.Mani – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Executive Engineer(O and M) Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution corporation Ltd (TANGEDCO), Kurinjipadi – Respondent
WP No. 10286 of 2026 | WMP.Nos.11143 & 11147 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Baskar
For Respondent: Mr.Venkata Seshaiya

Petitioner's consent to installment payment of electricity theft demand results in writ disposal and connection restoration.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners challenged a working sheet dated 11.02.2026 alleging electricity theft calculation demanding Rs.2,11,800/-. Essential facts involve prior electricity connection and disputed theft assessment. Court permitted installment payments for demand satisfaction. Second Paragraph: Primary issue framed as validity of theft-based demand notice. Ratio decidendi rests on petitioner's consent to structured repayment for connection restoration, without merits adjudication. Third Paragraph: Writ petition disposed of with directions for installment payments and electricity restoration upon first installment.

Table of Content
1. challenge to electricity theft demand notice (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's installment payment proposal (Para 4)
3. court orders payment schedule and restoration (Para 6 , 7)

ORDER

WMP.No.11143 of 2026 has been filed to permit the petitioners to file a single writ petition. This petition is ordered on payment of single court fee. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the working sheet dated

11.02.2026 issued by the respondent.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner obtained electricity connection from the respondent, however, the respondent has arrived at a calculation as if there is a theft in electricity and forced the petitioner to pay a demand amount of Rs.2,11,800/-. Hence, this writ petition.

4.When the case was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready to pay the demand amount by way of four installments. The first instalment he would be paid 30.03.2026 and seeks for restoration of electricity connection

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.

6. As agreed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner shall pay the first instalment of Rs.61,890 on or before 30.03.2026, immediately after receipt of the said amount, the respondent shall restore the electricity connection. It is made clear that the remaining amounts shall be paid by way of three instalments on 7th of every month.

7. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top