SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26952

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.SARAVANAN, J
DXC Technology India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Harish Bindumadhavan
For the Respondents:Mrs.P.Selvi Govt.Advocate

Court directs expeditious processing of GST refund claim with hearing opportunity.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 to direct processing of GST refund application in Form GST RFD-01A (ARN:AA330818026010P dated 21.08.2018) for excess amount in Electronic Cash Ledger, claiming entitlement under Sections 49(6) and 54(3) of CGST Act, 2017. The respondent undertook to consider the representation dated 07.08.2025. The court directed consideration on merits within six months, ensuring hearing of the petitioner. Issue framed: Direction to process refund claim pending since 2018. Ratio: Respondent's submission to consider representation binds the authority to act expeditiously and in accordance with law. Writ petition disposed of with directions to consider representation dated 07.08.2025 and pass orders within six months.

Table of Content
1. admission and disposal with consent (Para 2 , 3)
2. pending gst refund claim since 2018 (Para 4)
3. respondent's undertaking to consider (Para 5)
4. direction for expeditious orders with hearing (Para 6 , 7)

ORDER

Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent.

2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the respondent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the time of admission.

3. The petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent to consider the representation dated 07.08.2025 and to process the Refund application filed by the petitioner in RFD-01A bearing Refund ARN Receipt (ARN:AA330818026010P) dated 21.08.2018

4. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been chasing the aforesaid refund claim since 21.08.2018 in respect of excess amount lying in the petitioner’s Electronic Cash Ledger for Rs.28,05,170/-. However, the same has not been processed. It is submitted that the petitioner is entitled for refund in terms of Section 49(6) and Section 54(3) of CGST Act, 2017.

5. Learned Government Advocate for the respondent submits that the petitioner’s representation dated 07.08.2025 will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed.

6. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.08.2025 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. It is needless to state that, before passing any such order, the petitioner shall be heard.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top