SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26960

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
S. Haseena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
W.M.P.No.12010 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Saravanan
For the Respondent(s): Mr. C. Kulanthaivel, Senior Panel Counsel

Court cannot alter contract terms under Article 226 but grants limited indulgence for licence fee payment by specified date.

Headnote:The petitioner, a successful bidder for a catering stall licence at a railway station under a tender issued by Southern Railway, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 to direct acceptance of annual licence fee in instalments for the period 26/01/2026 to 25/01/2027, citing the Kerala High Court order in WP

(C).No.4226 of 2026. The licence was renewed periodically until 2026, but payment was delayed beyond the 15-day stipulated period due to unforeseen circumstances. The court found the parties bound by contract terms, declining to enforce instalments generally. The key issue was whether the court could direct waiver of contract terms for instalment payments. The ratio decidendi emphasized that under Article 226, courts cannot unilaterally alter contractual obligations, but limited indulgence is permissible considering case circumstances, allowing continuation upon full payment by a specified date. The writ petition was disposed of with directions for payment of Rs.33,66,666/- by 30/04/2026 to resume operations, failing which respondents may proceed as per law; no costs ordered.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's successful bid and delayed licence fee payment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's request for instalments versus respondents' contract enforcement. (Para 4 , 5)
3. limited court indulgence for full payment by deadline. (Para 7)

PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to permit the petitioner to operate the stall of Catering service at General minor unit number (GMU-1-4) at PF-10/11 adjacent to post at Puratchi Thailavar Dr.M.G.Ramachandran Central(MAS) Railway Station, Station Category A1 earmarked to general women category by accepting the Annual license fee for the period from 26/01/2026 to 25/01/2027 in five instalments with applicable penal charges that may be fixed by this Court in the light of the order of the Honble High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dated 04/02/2026 in WP(C).No.4226 of 2026.

For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Mr. C. Kulanthaivel, Senior Panel Counsel

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to permit the petitioner to operate the catering stall at General Minor Unit No.GMU-1-4, situated at Platform Nos.10/11 adjacent to post at Puratchi Thailavar Dr.M.G.Ramachandran Central(MAS) Railway Station, Station Category A1 earmarked to General Women category by accepting the Annual license fee for the period from 26/01/2026 to 25/01/2027 in five instalments with applicable penal charges that may be fixed by this Court in the light of the order of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dated 04/02/2026 in WP(C).No.4226 of 2026.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the successful bidder pursuant to the Tender Notice dated 11.09.2023 issued by the Southern Railway and that a letter of acceptance dated 28.12.2023 was issued in favour of the petitioner for operating the catering stall at General Minor Unit No.GMU 1-4 at Platform No.10/11 at Puratchi Thalaivar Dr.M.G.Ramachandran Central (MAS) Railway Station. The petitioner’s licence had been periodically renewed up to the year 2026.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner is liable to pay third annul annual license fee of Rs.33,66,666/- for the period from 26.01.2026 to 25.01.2027. As per the terms of the contract, the said amount is required to be paid within 15 days from the commencement of each licence year. However, due to unforeseen circumstances, the petitioner was unable to pay the said amount within the stipulated time. Hence, the present Writ petition has been filed.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that this Court may grant reasonable instalments to enable the petitioner to pay the said amount to the respondents.

5. Per contra, the learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents submitted that the relationship between the parties is governed strictly by the terms of the contract. It is submitted that prior to January, 2026, the petitioner had paid the licence amount and continued the licence. However, for the period from 26.01.2026 to 25.01.2027, the petitioner was required to pay the licence fee within 15 days from the commencement of the licence period. Despite lapse of more than one month, the petitioner has failed to pay the said amount. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to continue the operation of the catering stall. Hence, the learned counsel prayed for dismissal of the Writ Petition. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents.

7. Admittedly, the relationship between the petitioner and the respondents is governed by the contractual terms. This Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot issue any direction to the petitioner to waive the contract and unilaterally grant instalments for payment. However considering the facts and ci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top