SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 26973

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
S.Ramadasse – Appellant
Versus
The Volleyball Federation Of India – Respondent
WP No. 4381 of 2024 | WMP.Nos.4714 & 4715 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr.V.S.Senthil Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. M.Guru Prasad for R2, Mr.Prakash Adiapadam for R3

Challenge to association meeting notice becomes infructuous after meeting held; petitioner at liberty for future remedies.

Headnote:The petition under Article 226 challenges a notice dated 01.02.2024 issued by the association for convening a General Body Meeting allegedly contrary to its bye-laws. The petitioner, as former Secretary, sought to quash the notice. The court noted the meeting occurred on 25.02.2024, rendering the matter infructuous. No specific statutory sections beyond Article 226 were analyzed; facts centered on procedural non-compliance claims. Court found no need for intervention post-event. Issue: Whether the notice violated association bye-laws. Ratio: Once the General Body Meeting is held, challenge to preparatory notice becomes moot; future remedies available as per law. Writ petition disposed of without costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Table of Content
1. petition challenges bye-law violation in convening meeting. (Para 2)

ORDER

This petition has been filed challenging the order of the second respondent dated 01.02.2024 and quash the same.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was then Secretary of the second respondent Association and his grievance is that the second respondent decided to convene the General Body Meeting contrary to the Bye-

laws of the second respondent association, hence, the present writ petition. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the General Body Meeting was convened on 25.02.2024 and the matter has become infructuous.

4. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.

5. Since the General Body Meeting is already over, no order is required in this writ petition, however, in future, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top