Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Sivarama Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
The Medical Council of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks mandamus for council action on complaint. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissed for non-prosecution after action taken. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider petitioner complaint dated 08.03.2022 to take necessary action against the 3rd and 4th respondents as per Regulation 8 of Indian Medical council (Professional Conduct Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002 within the time period fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner: No Appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.Sam Dinakaran Manuel for Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan M/s.Maimoona Badsah For R3
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner’s complaint dated 08.03.2022 and to take necessary action against the respondents 3 & 4 as per Regulation 8 of Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2002, within the time period fixed by this Court.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3.Learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent would submit that th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
