SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 27123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J
M/s Shri Vari Textiles – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Commissioner (ST) – Respondent
WP No. 9964 of 2026 | WMP Nos.10785 & 10788 of 2026



Advocates:
For Petitioner(s): A Arun, M. Muthu, Yazhini, S.R Gerthanaa, Sri
For Respondent(s):Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate

GST appeal rejection on limitation upheld, but remitted for merits upon enhanced pre-deposit.

Headnote:Under Section 107 of the CGST Act, appeals must be filed within the condonable limitation period; the appellate authority rejected the petitioner's appeal against the assessment order dated 20.06.2025 as time-barred, having been filed on 21.08.2025 beyond the period, and a prior appeal on the same was dismissed for procedural deficiencies despite pre-deposit. The court found the rejection proper but noted the petitioner's willingness to deposit additional 15% tax. The primary issue was whether the appeal rejection on limitation grounds warranted interference under Article 226; the court held that while limitation dismissal was justified, condonation could be considered upon enhanced pre-deposit. The writ petition was disposed of, remitting the matter back to the appellate authority for fresh disposal on merits upon deposit of 15% additional disputed tax within 30 days, without reference to limitation if complied.

Table of Content
1. appeal rejected as time-barred under section 107. (Para 2)

ORDER

Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondents.

2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents.

3.The petitioner is before this court against the impugned order dated

22.12.2025 passed by the 1st respondent/Appellate Authority whereby the petitioner appeal against the order dated 20.06.2025 has been rejected on the ground of limitation. The said appeal has been rightly rejected by the Appellate Authority as it is beyond the condonable period of limitation provided under Section 107 of the respective GST Enactments, as such, dismissal of the appeal by the 1st respondent cannot be found fault with. It is also noticed that the petitioner had filed the appeal against the order dated 20.06.2025 on 21.08.2025 which came to be rejected by an order dated 25.10.2025 on the ground that Non-receipt of certified copies, Statement of Facts, Ground of Appeal not attached with annexure of FORM GST APL-01. However, it appears that the petitioner has deposited 10% of the disputed tax as is reflected from Form GST- 02 dated 25.10.2025 while rejecting the appeal filed on 21.08.2025. 4. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 15% of the disputed tax over and above the 10% deposited while filing the Appeal as a condition for seeking liberty to agitate his claims before the 1st Respondent/Appellate Authority.

5. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:-

“Petitioner undertakes to deposit 15% of the disputed tax amount.”

6. Recording the same, the case is remitted back on the file of the 1st Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 15% of the disputed tax over and above the 10% deposited while filing the Appeal, in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the 1st Respondent shall consider the appeal and dispose the same, on merits and in accordance with law, on it’s own turn, without further reference to limitation.

8. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top