IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
L.Gopalakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to encroachment notice amid boundary dispute and pending appeal (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. direct appeal disposal with eviction stay (Para 3) |
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the notice issued by the second respondent under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 in Na.Ka.4109/2025/a3 dated 03.12.2025 and to direct the first respondent/District Collector, Dindigul to pass orders in the petitioner's appeals dated 16.09.2025, 29.08.2025.
2.It is the contention of the petitioner that there is a dispute between the petitioner and his adjacent land owner, based on whose complaint, the proceedings under the Land Encroachment Act has been initiated as against the petitioner. He further contended that without conducting proper survey, the third respondent has issued notice under Section 7 of the Land Encroachment Act. Aggrieved by the said proceedings, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the first respondent, and the same is pending consideration. In the interregnum, the second respondent has issued the present eviction notice. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Cour
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.