SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 28281

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
R.Karunakaran – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
W.P. No. 8279 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.S. Mani
For the Respondents: V. Ashok Kumar

A challenge to a dismissal order from service is barred by laches if the aggrieved party accepts the order and fails to challenge it for an extended period, regardless of subsequent claims of medical incapacity.

Headnote:The petitioner, an ex-constable of the CRPF, sought a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash an order dated 31.08.2023 and requested the grant of compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (now Rule 39 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021). The petitioner claimed that his dismissal from service in 2002 for desertion was due to severe psychiatric illness (Paranoid Psychosis) and that the departmental enquiry was conducted ex parte. The court found that the petitioner had accepted the dismissal order for over 12 years before any representation was made. The primary issue was whether a challenge to a dismissal order passed in 2002 could be entertained after a lapse of over a decade. The court reasoned that the petitioner had remained silent for 12 years and failed to provide any new material during the personal hearing to justify the reversal of the dismissal. Consequently, the court held that the challenge to the original order is clearly barred by laches. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks compassionate allowance and quashing of dismissal order based on psychiatric illness. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. administrative history shows a significant delay in challenging the dismissal order. (Para 6 , 7)
3. challenge to service dismissal is barred by laches due to excessive delay. (Para 8)

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in Order No.R.XIII-11/ 2023-SZ- CRV-I dated 31.08.2023 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, non-speaking and contrary to the directions issued by this Honble Court, consequently direct the respondents to grant compassionate Allowance to the petitioner under Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (now Rule 39 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021) by duly considering the petitioner’s long-standing psychiatric illness, medical incapacity and special circumstances in a humane and judicious manner; In the alternative, direct the respondents to reconsider the petitioner’s claim for compassionate allowance and /or medical invalidation afresh by a higher and independent authority, strictly in compliance with the binding directions of this Honourable Court and the law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court, pending disposal of this writ petition, direct the respondents to provisionally consider and sanction compassionate allowance to the petitioner, subject to the result of the writ petition, in order to alleviate continuing hardship and deprivation of livelihood.

For Petitioner: Mr.G.S.Mani

For Respondents: Mr.V.Ashok Kumar

(R1 to R6) Senior Panel Counsel

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in Order No.R.XIII-11/ 2023-SZ- CRV-I dated 31.08.2023 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, non-speaking and contrary to the directions issued by this Honble Court, consequently direct the respondents to grant compassionate Allowance to the petitioner under Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (now Rule 39 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021) by duly considering the petitioner’s long-standing psychiatric illness, medical incapacity and special circumstances in a humane and judicious manner; In the alternative, direct the respondents to reconsider the petitioner’s claim for compassionate allowance and /or medical invalidation afresh by a higher and independent authority, strictly in compliance with the binding directions of this Honourable Court and the law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court, pending disposal of this writ petition, direct the respondents to provisionally consider and sanction compassionate allowance to the petitioner, subject to the result of the writ petition, in order to alleviate continuing hardship and deprivation of livelihood.

2. The brief facts, which have resulted in the filing of the present Writ Petition as set out in the Writ Petition, are as follows:-

2.1. The petitioner, an Ex-Constable (GD) of the CRPF, was dismissed from service on 25.02.2002 after being declared a deserter with effect from 07.06.2001. It is the case of the petitioner that during the relevant period, he was suffering from a severe psychiatric illness (Paranoid Psychosis) and was undergoing continuous treatment in various Government and private psychiatric hospitals, including the Base Hospital CRPF (Hyderabad), Government Medical College (Coimbatore), Institute of Psychiatry (Madurai), and Sundaram Medical Foundation (Chennai).

2.2. On account of his deteriorating mental state, the petitioner was unable to rejoin duty or effectively participate in the departmental enquiry. The petitioner submits that the said enquiry was conducted ex parte without due consideration of his medical records, thereby violating the principles of natural justice

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top