SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 28321

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. Saravanan, J
Savista Global Solutions Private Limited Formerly – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner – Respondent
WP No. 6107 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Karthik Sundaram
For the Respondents: Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, K.S. Ramasamy

Sanctioned tax refunds cannot be delayed or withheld by authorities due to internal procedural hurdles, red tapism, or requirements for the revalidation of previous sanction orders.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India directing the refund of State Tax sanctioned under Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 for the period July 2017 to March 2018. The petitioner, an exporter of IT enabled services, had claimed a refund of unutilised Input Tax Credit for zero rated supplies. While the Central Authority sanctioned the refunds, a significant portion of the SGST remained outstanding. The primary issue was whether the refund of sanctioned State Tax could be delayed due to internal procedural requirements, specifically the need for revalidation of sanction orders. The court observed that the refund amount cannot be kept waiting on account of procedural hurdles and red tapism, noting that the respondent should have coordinated with their counterpart to resolve the issue. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to refund the amount due and payable to the petitioner together with applicable interest under the respective GST Enactments within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

PRAYER

Writ Petition filed under Art. 226 of Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing 1st Respondent to process the full refund of State Tax sanctioned by the 2nd Respondent under Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 for the period from July 2017 to March 2018 along with interest at 6 percent per annum under Section 56 of the CGST Act read with Notification No. 13 2017 Central Tax for the delay in refund of State tax within a reasonable period.

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to process the full refund of State Tax sanctioned by the 2nd respondent under Section 54 of the respective GST Enactment.

The petitioner is engaged in the export of IT enabled services and other Business Processing Outsourcing Services to its overseas customers and had claimed refund of the unutilised Input Tax Credit for the zero rated supplies made by the petitioner between July 2017 to March 2018. The refunds were also sanctioned by the Central Authority on various dates, but however, only part of SGST was refunded to the petitioner out of an amount of Rs.47,73,219/-.

The details of the amount sanctioned vide sanction order and the balance outstanding refund amount are provided as under :-

Particulars CGST IGST SGST
Total amount claimed 49,94,525 17,73,817 49,94,525
Total amount sanctioned 47,73,219 10,41,026 47,73,219
Total amount refunded 47,73,219 10,41,026 7,75,672*
Total outstanding Full paid Fully paid 39,97,547/-

Today, the learned counsel for 1st respondent has produced a communication dated 04.03.2026 bearing Ref. Rc.189/2025/B1, wherein it has been stated as under :-

“I solicit your kind attention to the references cited. In continuation of this office reference 4th cited, I submit that the reference letter was sent to the O/o. The Assistant Commissioner of GST and CE Sholinganallur Division, Chennai-600 035 vide reference 5th cited calling for the refund sanctioned order of the CGST Authorities for the period from July 2017 to September 2017.

The sanction orders have been received from the CGST Authority vide reference 6th cited. But, on verification the sanctioned orders received were dated 05.11.2019 and 23.12.2019. In order to present the refund bills to the PAO (South) at this stage, it is informed that the sanctioned orders have to the revalidated as on date. Hence, the reference letter for revalidation has been sent to the Assistant Commissioner of GST & CE, Sholinganllur Division, Chennai-600 035 vide this office reference 7th cited sent through RPAD by post on 03.03.2026.

Hence, I submit as soon as the revalidation orders received in this office the pending refunds will be processed.

This is submitted for your kind information.”

The refund amount, which is due to the petitioner cannot be kept waiting on account of procedural hurdles and red tapism. The office of 1st respondent ought to have followed his/her counter part. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to refund the amount due and payable to the petitioner together with applicable interest under the respective GST Enactments within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observation. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top