SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 28398

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
Rukku – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
WP No. 7712 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.P. Yuaraj
For the Respondents: T.M. Rajangam, Madhusudhanan

The court directed the disbursement of compensation for death by electrocution as per established board proceedings, while granting the petitioner liberty to seek enhancement through the District Legal Services Authority.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pay compensation of Rs. 50,00,000/- with interest for the death of her husband due to electrocution on 02.05.2025. The petitioner had submitted a representation on 31.10.2025 which remained unconsidered. The court noted the respondents' willingness to pay a specific amount based on existing board proceedings. The primary issue was the disbursement of compensation for the accidental death. The court observed that the respondents agreed to disburse Rs. 10,00,000/- in terms of TNPDCL Proceedings No. 11 dated 21.12.2024. The court reasoned that given the limited relief sought, the agreed amount should be paid promptly. This Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to disburse a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation amount in terms of the board proceedings dated 21.12.2024 to the petitioner within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Table of Content
1. claim for compensation following death by electrocution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. agreement between parties on the disbursement of compensation. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court direction for payment and liberty for enhancement of compensation. (Para 6 , 7)

Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay the compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) together with interest at the rate of 7.5 % per annum from the date of accident for the death of the petitioner’s husband.

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to pay the compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) to the petitioner together with interest at the rate of 7.5 % per annum from the date of accident on account of the death of her husband due to electrocution.

2. Mr.T.M.Rajangam, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the 1st respondent. Mr.Madhusudhanan, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of respondents 2 to 4.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that her representation dated 31.10.2025 seeking compensation amount of Rs.50,00,000/- towards the death of her husband who died on 02.05.2025 due to electrocution has not been considered by the respondents till date. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, it would suffice, if this Court issues a direction to the respondents to disburse the compensation to the petitioner by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 31.10.2025 within the time that may be stipulated by this Court.

5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the compensation amount of Rs.10,00,000/- will be disbursed to the petitioner in terms of the TNPDCL Proceedings No.11 dated 21.12.2024 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. In view of the limited relief sought for in this Writ Petition, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to disburse a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation amount in terms of the board proceedings dated 21.12.2024 to the petitioner within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If at all the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the quantum of compensation awarded, she is at liberty to approach the Tamil nadu District Legal Services Authority for enhancement of compensation.

7. This Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

02-03-2026

Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No

NHS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top