A.Punitha Ruby vs R.Prince Arockiaraj - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 28418

Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 28418

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
B. Pugalendhi, J
A.Punitha Ruby – Appellant
Versus
R.Prince Arockiaraj – Respondent
Cont.P.(MD)No.1240 of 2025

Important Points

A contempt petition is liable to be closed when the parties concede that the directions of the court in the underlying order have been fully complied with.

Subject

Civil Law - Contempt of Court

Act Referred

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: S.11

Headnote

The petition was filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of a court order dated 10.07.2024. The petitioner sought to punish the respondent for the deliberate failure to comply with the directions issued in a previous writ petition. The primary issue was whether the respondent had complied with the court's order. Upon submission by the learned counsel for both parties that the order had been complied with, the court found no further cause for action. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: H. Jasima Yasmin
For the Respondents: S. Vinodh

Prayer :

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / second respondent herein for the deliberate and wilful disobedience of the order dated 10.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP.(MD)No.15312 of 2024.

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court that the order of this Court in WP.(MD)No.15312 of 2024 dated 10.07.2024, has not been complied with.

Today, the learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the order passed by this Court has been complied with.

Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.

27.02.2026

NCC : Yes/No

Index : Yes/No

Internet:Yes

gns

District Educational Officer (Primary Education),

Ramanathapuram,

Ramanathapuram District.