IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI
K.Tamil Selvan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In – Respondent
##PAGE1##
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.864 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.02.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.864 of 2026
and Crl.M.P(MD).No.932 2026
K.Tamil Selvan ... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Tamilnadu
rep., by the Inspector of Police,
Dindigul Taluk Police Station,
Dindigul District.
Crime No.318 of 2025 ... Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to call for the
records relating to the FIR in Crime No.318 of 2025 on the file of the
respondent police and quash the same as illegal this petitioner concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manikandan
For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthikumar
Government Advocate (crl.side)
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/03/2026 01:24:16 pm )
##PAGE2##Crl.O.P.(MD)No.864 of 2026
ORDER
Seeking quashment of the impugned FIR in Crime No.318 of 2025
registered for the offences under Sections 196(1)(a), 197(1)(c), 353(1)(c) and
353(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000,
on the file of the respondent police, this criminal original petition is filed.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the case of the
prosecution is that, during the conduct of the “Kaliamman Temple Festival” in
the petitioner’s village, religious disputes arose between the Hindu and
Christian communities. Consequently, two First Information Reports in Crime
Nos. 313 and 314 of 2025 were registered on 28.05.2025 against the rival
parties. In the interregnum, while the dishormony in the village was still
continuing, on 25.05.2025, the petitioner allegedly posted a message along with
a photograph in his Facebook account, abusing persons who had converted
from the Hindu religion to Christianity. In this regard, a First Information
Report in Crime No. 318 of 2025 was registered for the aforesaid offences.
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/03/2026 01:24:16 pm )
##PAGE3##Crl.O.P.(MD)No.864 of 2026
3.He categorically contended that the first information report deserves to
be quashed to secure the ends of justice and to prevent abuse of process of law.
He also pointed out that a clear reading of the first information report itself
would make it clear that the various offences added in the first information
report will not be made out as against the petitioner. In the absence of specific
overt act as against the petitioner, the first information report should necessary
be quashed and sought for the indulgence of this Court.
4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) submitted that the
Facebook post made by the petitioner was with the intent of aggravating the
prevailing communal tension between the two communities on the said date.
Hence, a clear overt act is made out against the petitioner and sought for
dismissal of this original petition.
5.Heard either side and carefully perused the materials available on
record.
6.As per Section 196 (1)(a) and Section 197(1)(c) of BNS pertain to
offences relating to promoting enmity between different groups. However, a
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/03/2026 01:24:16 pm )
##PAGE4##Crl.O.P.(MD)No.864 of 2026
careful reading of the Facebook post made by the petitioner would show that it
does not promote enmity between two groups, but is, at best, a general
statement regarding religious conversion.
7.As far as offences under Sections 353(1)(c) and 353(2) of BNS, the
same is with respect to statements conducting to public mischief. Section
353(1)(c) of BNS is with respect to those statement circulated with intent to
incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit
any offence against any other class or community. In the instant case, the face
book posting in question cannot be construed as one hosted with intent to
incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit
any offence against any other class or community.
8.As the offence under Section 353(2) of BNS is with respect to
circulating any false information, rumour or alarmin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.