IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
G.Rashmitha – Appellant
Versus
S.V. Chandra Kumar – Respondent
##PAGE1##
Tr.CMP(MD).No.128 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.02.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tr.CMP(MD).No.128 of 2026
and
C.M.P.(MD).No.2548 of 2026
G.Rashmitha ... Petitioner
Vs.
S.V.Chandra Kumar ... Respondent
Prayer : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil
Procedure Code to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.284 of 2025 on the file of the
Family Court, Karur and transfer the same to the Family Court, Dindigul in
order to try the same along with H.M.O.P.No.337 of 2025 on the file of the
Family Court, Dindigul.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeya Prakash
For Respondent : Mr.Antony Rajadurai
for M/s.Roy and Roy Associates
ORDER
This transfer petition is at the instance of the wife. She seeks withdrawal
of H.M.O.P.No.284 of 2025 on the file of the Family Court, Karur and transfer
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/03/2026 12:37:30 pm )
##PAGE2##Tr.CMP(MD).No.128 of 2026
the same to the Family Court, Dindigul in order to try the same along with
H.M.O.P.No.337 of 2025 on the file of the Family Court, Dindigul.
2. Heard Mr.C.Jeya Prakash, learned counsel for petitioner and
Mr.Antony Rajadurai, learned counsel for respondent.
3. Marriage between petitioner and respondent was solemnized on
01.09.2021, according to Hindu rites and customs and they have a female child,
who is now aged about 2 years. Due to differences, parties have separated.
Respondent/husband initiated proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.284 of 2025 for
divorce before Family Court, Karur and petitioner/wife initiated proceedings in
H.M.O.P.No.337 of 2025 for restitution of conjugal rights before Family Court,
Dindigul. Pleading that wife is residing in Dindigul and unable to travel from
Dindigul to Karur, she has moved this transfer petition.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that petitioner has to take
care of her minor child and has to be accompanied by her aged parents, who
suffer from age related ailments. She also expressed difficulty inasmuch as she
may have to travel a distance of 160 Kms (to and fro) to attend each hearing at
Family Court, Karur. She would therefore request this Court to transfer
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/03/2026 12:37:30 pm )
##PAGE3##Tr.CMP(MD).No.128 of 2026
H.M.O.P.No.284 of 2025 from the Family Court, Karur to Family Court,
Dindigul, to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.337 of 2025.
5. Mr.Antony Rajadurai, learned counsel, on instructions from
respondent would submit that it would be difficult for respondent to appear
before Family Court, Dindigul. Therefore, he requests that respondent's
physical appearance may be dispensed with, except for essential hearings where
he agrees to appear in person. Importantly, respondent has no objection to
transfer the case in H.M.O.P.No.284 of 2025 from the file of Family Court,
Karur to Family Court, Dindigul.
6. It is relevant to note that Parliament, while amending the Hindu
Marriage Act, has incorporated Section 19(iii), permitting a wife to initiate a
proceeding in a place where she is residing. This is an indication that
convenience of the wife has to be given precedence by the Court. In line with
this Parliamentary amendment, this Court and the Supreme Court have
consistently held in matters of transfer, convenience of wife should be given a
superior consideration than that of husband. As the distance between Dindigul
and Karur is considerable and since it will be difficult for the wife to travel for
attending the Court, I am inclined to allow the petition seeking transfer as
prayed for.
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/03/2026 12:37:30 pm )
##PAGE4##Tr.CMP(MD).No.128 of 2026
7. In view thereof, H.M.O.P No.284 of 2025 pending on the file of
Family Court, Karur, is hereby ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the
file of Family Court, Dindigul. The Family Court, Dindigul, shall try the said
case along with H.M.O.P.No.337 of 2025 pending on its file.
8. Family Court may not insist upon the physical presence of husband
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.