SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR
Khadar Ibrahim – Appellant
Versus
Subaitha Begam – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 10.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.R.P(MD). No.334 of 2026 and C.M.P(MD) No.1513 of 2026 Khadar Ibrahim ... Petitioner Vs

1.Subhaitha Begum

2.Amran Hussain

3.Umaima Rasmi ... Respondents PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the learned Additional District Munsif Judge, Kumbakonam passed in I.A. No.313 of 2024 in O.S.No.114 of 2024 dated 19.08.2025 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif Judge, Kumbakonam.

For Petitioner : M/s.A.Vijayasri for Mr.K.Narayanan

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 19.08.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Munsif Judge, Kumbakonam, in I.A.No.313 of 2024 in O.S.No.114 of 2024, whereby the application for interim injunction filed by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. The trial Court dismissed the injunction application on the ground that the matter requires a full-fledged trial and that the issues involved have to be adjudicated on the basis of evidence.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is facing day-to-day interference from the respondent and therefore, sought an order of interim injunction to enable him to run his business without disturbance.

4. It is well settled that the grant of temporary injunction is a discretionary relief vested with the trial Court. When the trial Court, upon consideration of the pleadings, has come to the conclusion that the matter requires trial and adjudication on evidence, this Court, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction, would not ordinarily interfere with such discretionary orders, unless the same is shown to be perverse or arbitrary.

5. This Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the trial Court warranting interference.

6. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as devoid of merits. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

No costs.

Speaking : Yes / No 10.02.2026 Indu N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

Indu

10.02.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top