Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29514
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.POORNIMA, J
R.G.Arulmany – Appellant
Versus
S.Essakkiappan – Respondent
SA No.546 of 2003|CMA No.815 of 2003
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.P.Senthil, Mr.J.Antony Jesus
For the Respondents: No appearance
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.P.Senthil, Mr.J.Antony Jesus
For the Respondents: No appearance
Appeals dismissed for appellant's default due to non-prosecution despite adjournments.
Headnote:Under Section 100 C.P.C. and Order 43 Rule 1 C.P.C., second appeal and civil miscellaneous appeal filed against judgments of II Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli in AS No.132 of 2002 reversing decree of Principal Sub Judge, Tirunelveli in OS No.279 of 1995. Court observed appellant's lack of interest despite adjournments. No issues framed as matter not pursued. Both appeals dismissed for default. No costs.
COMMON JUDGMENT
In spite of several adjournments, the appellant in both matters is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, both the appeals are dismissed for default. No costs.
