SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29562

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
M.Pandiselvi – Appellant
Versus
The State Represented by, The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.3046 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Balamuruganantham
For the Respondents: Mr.S.P.Maharajan,Mr.K.Saravanan

No mandamus for encroachment removal on private Ryotwari land; pursue easement rights in civil court.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution directing authorities to remove alleged encroachments on Survey No.113/34, classified as Ryotwari Punjai private land, not government property. Facts involved claims of pathway occupation, pillar erection, and septic tank construction causing access hardship, with prior representation made. Court found the land private per 'A' Register, denying mandamus jurisdiction. Issue framed as whether officials must remove encroachments on private land. Ratio: Classification as Ryotwari Punjai establishes private ownership; no direction possible against officials for private disputes (paras 3,5). Writ petition dismissed; petitioner directed to civil court for easementary rights.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim of encroachment on pathway. (Para 1 , 2)
2. land classified as private ryotwari punjai. (Para 3)
3. 'a' register confirms private land status. (Para 4 , 5)
4. no mandamus; remedy lies in civil court. (Para 6)

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action to remove the alleged encroachment made by the respondents 4 and 5 in Survey No.113/34 of Sakkudi Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District.

2.It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondents 4 and 5 have encroached upon the property in Survey No.113/34 of Sakkudi Village.

According to the petitioner, they have encroached upon the pathway on the southern side and erected a pillar after removing the paver blocks laid by the Government. It is further stated that, on the eastern side, they have occupied the pathway and constructed a septic tank by damaging the paver blocks. Due to such encroachments, the local residents are facing hardship in accessing their homes. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 16.06.2025 to the concerned authorities. Since no action has been taken thus far, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

3.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that Survey No.113/34 is classified as “Ryotwari Punjai”, which is a private land and not a Government land.

4.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

5.On perusal of the ‘A’ Register filed in support of the Writ Petition, it is seen that Survey No.113/34 is classified as “Ryotwari Punjai”, thereby establishing that the property is a private land.

6.In such circumstances, the question of directing the official respondents to remove the alleged encroachment does not arise. If the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to access to the pathway or any easementary right, it is always open to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the competent civil Court in the manner known to law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top