Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
N.Rajmohan – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner (RAL), Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Madurai East, Commercial Taxes Buildings, Madurai – 20 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ challenges gst itc blocking order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner opts for representation; respondent agrees. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. order set aside; remanded for fresh hearing. (Para 5) |
(Respondent is substituted vide order of this Court dated 24.03.2026 ) ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in GSTIN:33ACFFA1131R1ZH for the period from 05.02.2026 to 04.03.2026, quash the same and direct the respondent to unblock the ITC to the tune of Rs.90,355/- and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner :Mr.T.Bashyam For Respondent :Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
This Writ petition is filed for a Certiorarified Mandamus challenging the impugned order for the period from 05.02.2026 to 04.03.2026 and quash the same and to direct the respondent to unblock the ITC to the tune of Rs.90,355/-.
2. Heard Mr.T.Bashyam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
