Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
A.Jeyakumar – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner (RAL) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ challenging gst itc blocking order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner agrees to representation; respondent to consider. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. order remanded for fresh consideration with hearing. (Para 5) |
(Respondent is substituted vide order of this Court dated 24.03.2026 ) ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in GSTIN:33AUEPJ8359B1ZS for the period from 01.02.2026 to 18.02.2026, quash the same and direct the respondent to unblock the ITC to the tune of Rs.11,53,975/- and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner :Mr.T.Bashyam For Respondent :Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader ORDER
This Writ petition is filed for a Certiorarified Mandamus challenging the impugned orders for the period from 01.02.2026 to 18.02.2026 and quash the same and to direct the respondent to unblock the ITC to the tune of Rs.11,53,975/-.
2. Heard Mr.T.Bashyam, learned counsel appearing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
