Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Maripandi – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Rural (East), Commercial Taxes Department, Madurai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to itc blocking orders under writ jurisdiction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's offer for representation accepted by respondent. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. orders set aside; remanded for fresh merits consideration. (Para 5) |
The Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Rural (East), Commercial Taxes Department, Madurai. ...Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Reference No. BL3302260000782, dated 17.02.2026, Reference No. BL3302260000856, dated 18.02.2026 and Reference No. BL3302260000858, dated 18.02.2026 in GSTIN-33AHUPM9318E1Z1, quash the same, and direct the respondent to unblock the ITC to the tune of Rs.15,82,418/- and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner :Mr.T.Bashyam For Respondent :Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
This Writ petition is filed for a Certiorarified Mandamus challenging the impugned orders dated 17.02.2026 and 18.02.2026 and quash
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
