SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29592

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
A.Chandrababu – Appellant
Versus
D.C.Donie Prasad – Respondent
Criminal Original Petition|STC.No.29 of 2023|Crl.A.No.52 of 2025|Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2025|Crl.M.P.No.2048 of 2025



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.P.Pugalendhi for Mr.D.Raja
For Respondents:

Court grants limited time extension for compliance with suspension conditions, no further adjournments.

Headnote:The petitioner was convicted by the trial court and appealed, seeking suspension of sentence with conditions including deposit of 20% compensation. The Sessions Court admitted the appeal, suspended sentence conditionally, extended time once, but dismissed the petition for non-compliance and non-appearance. No specific statutes quoted in the proceedings. Issues framed involve compliance with court-ordered deposit and extension requests. Ratio decidendi emphasizes strict adherence to timelines for conditional sentence suspension, allowing limited extensions only upon demonstrated readiness. Criminal Original Petition disposed of, granting two weeks' time for compliance, with no further extensions; petition to stand dismissed otherwise.

Table of Content
1. background of conviction, appeal, and dismissal for non-compliance. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's readiness to deposit and execute bonds. (Para 2)
3. final extension granted with no further adjournments. (Para 3 , 4)

ORDER

The petitioner/accused was convicted by the trial court in STC.No.29 of

2023 on 10.03.2025. The petitioner preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.52 of 2025 and a suspension of sentence petition in Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2025. The learned Sessions Judge by order dated 05.06.2025 admitted the appeal and suspended the sentence of the petitioner by imposing conditions. One such condition was that the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount i.e., Rs.2,40,000/- within a period of one month from 05.06.2025. Thereafter, the petitioner had filed another petition in Crl.M.P.No.2048 of 2025 seeking extension for a further period of two weeks. This petition has also been ordered and the time was extended for a period of two weeks from 08.07.2025 and the case was posted for compliance of the condition on 22.07.2025. As neither the petitioner nor his counsel entered appearance and the amount was not deposited, Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2025 was dismissed. Hence, the present Criminal Original Petition has been filed.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is now ready and willing to deposit the amount as ordered by the lower appellate court in Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2025 on 08.07.2025 and seeks 10 days’ time to deposit the same. He also seeks permission to execute the security bonds as directed in Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2025 on 08.07.2025.

3. In the view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, two weeks’ time from today is granted to comply with the conditions made in Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2025 on 08.07.2025.. It is made clear that no further adjournments or extension of time will be granted. In any event, the petition shall stand dismissed without further notice.

4. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top