IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
A.Chandrababu – Appellant
Versus
D.C.Donie Prasad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's readiness to deposit and execute bonds. (Para 2) |
| 2. final extension granted with no further adjournments. (Para 3) |
ORDER
The petitioner/accused was convicted by the trial court in STC.No.29 of 2023 on 10.03.2025. The petitioner preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.52 of 2025 and a suspension of sentence petition in Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2025. The learned Sessions Judge by order dated 05.06.2025 admitted the appeal and suspended the sentence of the petitioner by imposing conditions. One such condition was that the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount i.e., Rs.2,40,000/- within a period of one month from 05.06.2025. Thereafter, the petitioner had filed another petition in Crl.M.P.No.2048 of 2025 seeking extension for a further period of two weeks. This petition has also been ordered and the time was extended for a period of two weeks from 08.07.2025 and the case was posted for compliance of the condition on 22.07.2025. As neither the petitioner nor his counsel entered appearance and the amount was not deposited, Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2025 was dismissed. Hence, the present Criminal Original Petition has been filed.
2. The learned counsel for the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.