Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
A.K.Rajpiriyan – Appellant
Versus
P.M.Saravanakrishnan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant's possession under oral lease and statutory rights (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. impleadment application by co-heir (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. petitioner's opposition to impleadment (Para 11) |
| 4. co-heirs entitled to represent lessee's estate (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. revision dismissed with trial directions (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
O R D E R
Heard Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu, for the petitioner. The 7th defendant is the Civil Revision Petitioner.
2. The bare facts necessary for the disposal of the revision are as follows:
O.S.No.179 of 2021 was originally numbered as O.S.No.342 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court at Srivilliputhur. After the creation of a Munsif Court at Rajapalayam, the said suit was transferred and renumbered as O.S.No.179 of 2021.
3. The said suit is one for permanent injunction. The claim of the plaintiff is that his father, one P.S.Balakrishna Raja had taken a vacant land on lease from one, S.K.Alagu Raja. The lease is said to have been entered sometime in the year 1962. The lease is said to be oral.
4. Balakrishna Raja, after he had taken possession of vacant land, had put up a superstructure and was running a Saw-Mill therein. Sub
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
