IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Kumaresh Babu, JJ
Divya Annamalai – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tahsildar inspection finds no encroachments. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner disputes inspection scope. (Para 2) |
| 3. civil court for ownership/public street disputes; writ disposed. (Para 3 , 4) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
With reference to the relief sought for in the present Writ Petition, the Tahsildar, Thiruvottiyur Taluk has conducted an inspection and submitted written instructions to the learned Additional Government Pleader vide letter dated 24.03.2026. As per the instructions of the Tahsildar, there is no encroachment identified. The subject property is identified as a patta land in unapproved layout.
2. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner would oppose the same by stating that the road portion as stated in the Writ Petition has not been taken into consideration.
3. In the event of any dispute relating to ownership, it is for the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court of law to resolve the dispute. That being the case, if any civil dispute exists relating to existence of public street, it is for the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court of law.
4. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.