SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29655

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L. Victoria Gowri, J
Shanmugam – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi Nibcid Police Station, Thoothukkudi District – Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition CRL RC(MD) No.597 of 2026 | Cr.M.P.No.237 of 2026 | Crime No.7 of 2023



Advocates:
For Petitioner:Mr. P.T.Ramesh Raja, Advocate
For Respondent: Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

Interim custody of seized vehicle granted to prevent deterioration, despite NDPS offence allegations.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Relevant provisions under NDPS Act Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)

(B), 25, 29(1) for illegal transportation of ganja. Vehicle seized in Crime No.7 of 2023 after FIR. Petitioner claimed vehicle stolen earlier (Crime No.390 of 2022), sought interim custody under Section 497 BNSS. Court found lower court dismissal erroneous, noting vehicle deterioration if kept exposed. Second Paragraph: Issues framed on interim custody despite prosecution objection over potential reuse in crime. Ratio: No purpose served retaining vehicle in custody as it would diminish value from exposure to elements; petitioner's non-involvement and theft claim weighed. Third Paragraph: Revision allowed, impugned order set aside, vehicle released on conditions including bond and undertakings.

Table of Content
1. petition challenges dismissal of vehicle release application in ndps case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court weighs vehicle deterioration against retention purpose. (Para 4 , 7)
3. prosecution opposes custody; petitioner claims theft and deterioration. (Para 5 , 6)
4. revision allowed with conditions for interim custody. (Para 8)

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition is filed to call for the records relating to the order of the learned Principal Special Court for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act cases, Madurai, in Cr.M.P.No. 237 of 2026 dated 07.03.2026 filed by the petitioner under Section 497 of BNSS and set aside the same as illegal and entrust the custody of the vehicle to the petitioner and allow the above Criminal Revision Petition.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the 1st respondent filed a FIR in Crime No.7 of 2023 for an alleged offence under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 and 29(1) of the NDPS Act, for illegal transportation of Ganja through TVS Jupiter 125 bearing registration No.TN 63 BM 5794. Subsequently, the petitioner's vehicle was seized. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.237 of 2026 for the return of vehicle before the learned Principal Special Court for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act cases, Madurai, and the same was dismissed on

07.03.2026.

3. The petitioner preferred this Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 07.03.2026 made in Crl.M.P.No.237 of 2026 on the file of the learned Principal Special Court for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act cases, Madurai and to set aside the same.

4. Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Mr.S.Ravi, submitted that if the vehicle is returned to the petitioner, there is possibility for the vehicle being used for the commission of similar offence and objected to grant interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 63 BM 5794 was owned by the petitioner and the same was stolen on 17.11.2022 and the petitioner has lodged a complaint in this regard, based on which Crime No.390 of

2022 was also registered on 05.12.2022. Further submitted that he was not involved in any such offence as alleged by the respondent and if the vehicle is kept in open place, the vehicle will get deteriorated and the value of the vehicle would automatically stand diminished and therefore interim custody may be granted to the petitioner.

7. Considering the fact that if the vehicle is kept in open place exposing to sun and rain, the value of the vehicle will be deteriorated and no purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle in custody, this Court is inclined to allow the revision and thereby setting aside the impugned order dated 07.03.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.237 of 2026 by the learned Principal Special Court for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act cases, Madurai.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the order dated 07.03.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.237 of 2026 by the learned Principal Special Court for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act cases, Madurai, is hereby set aside and the vehicle viz., TVS Jupiter 125 bearing registration No.TN 63 BM 5794, is ordered to be returned to the petitioner for interim custody subject to the confiscation proceedings to be taken by the concern Department or by the Court on the following conditions:-

(a)the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Special Court for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act cases, Madurai ;

(b)The petitioner shall deposit the copy of RC Book of the vehicle before the learned Principal Special Court for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act cases, Mad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top