SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29680

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
T.Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corproation – Respondent
WP No. 12241 of 2026|WMP. 13365 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr.N.Kalidoss
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Santosh Stdg. Counsel for RR 1 and 2, Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Govt. Advocate, for RR 3 and 4

Petition withdrawn with liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies.

Headnote:Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioners sought mandamus directing authorities to demolish unauthorized construction and encroachment by private respondent. Court permitted withdrawal of petition. Issues framed related to consideration of representations for removal of encroachment. Ratio: Liberty granted to pursue appropriate legal remedy. Petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Table of Content
1. withdrawal permitted with liberty for alternate remedy. (Para 1 , 2)

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

2. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon