Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29680
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
T.Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corproation – Respondent
WP No. 12241 of 2026|WMP. 13365 of 2026
Important Points
Petition withdrawn with liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies.
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Act Referred
Headnote
Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioners sought mandamus directing authorities to demolish unauthorized construction and encroachment by private respondent. Court permitted withdrawal of petition. Issues framed related to consideration of representations for removal of encroachment. Ratio: Liberty granted to pursue appropriate legal remedy. Petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr.N.Kalidoss
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Santosh Stdg. Counsel for RR 1 and 2, Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Govt. Advocate, for RR 3 and 4
For the Petitioners: Mr.N.Kalidoss
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Santosh Stdg. Counsel for RR 1 and 2, Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Govt. Advocate, for RR 3 and 4
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. withdrawal permitted with liberty for alternate remedy. (Para 1 , 2) |
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
2. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs.
