SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29680

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
T.Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corproation – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr.N.Kalidoss
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Santosh Stdg. Counsel for RR 1 and 2, Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Govt. Advocate, for RR 3 and 4

Table of Content
1. withdrawal permitted with liberty for alternate remedy. (Para 1 , 2)

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

2. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top