SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29683

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G Arul Murugan, J
KRL Advertising – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation – Respondent
WP No. 12316 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.A.Manojkumar
For the Respondents: Ms.K.Aswini Devi Stdg. Counsel for RR 1 to 5

Mandamus directs authority to consider representation for hoarding permission expeditiously with reasoned order.

Headnote:Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner sought permission for erecting hoardings after paying required fees in compliance with Supreme Court order. Court directed consideration of representation. Issues framed as need for expeditious decision on representation for hoarding permission. Ratio: Competent authority must consider application in accordance with law, issue reasoned speaking order after hearing. Petition disposed of with directions, no costs.

Table of Content
1. writ petition seeks mandamus for hoarding permission. (Para 1)
2. petitioner complied with fees and submitted representation. (Para 2)
3. respondents agree to consider application per law. (Para 3)
4. direct reasoned order after hearing, petition disposed. (Para 4)

This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 05.02.2026 seeking permission for erecting 3 nos. of hoardings as per application in the premises of the petitioner situated at No.137/148, Nelson Manickam Road, Metha Nagar, Chennai-600 029.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in compliance of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, as per the demand, the rent/damage fees, etc. have already been paid to the Department and thereafter, as per the direction, the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 05.02.2026, on which, the competent authority has not passed any order and therefore, prays that the competent authority may be directed to consider the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the application/representation of the petitioner shall be considered by the competent authority in accordance with law.

4. In view of the above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the competent authority to take a call on the representation dated 05.02.2026 of the petitioner in accordance with law, and pass a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned. We have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

Petition is disposed of, with the aforesaid direction. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top