Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
M.C.Sheela Evanjalin – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Municipal Administration – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges internal work adjustment as unauthorized transfer. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner argues order is transfer by incompetent authority under rule 222. (Para 3) |
| 3. accountant, assistant, revenue inspector posts inter-transferable per rule 219. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. internal work adjustment not transfer; no prejudice to service conditions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. writ dismissed; third party not impleaded. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
Heard Mr.A.Thirumoorthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.V.Om Prakash, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.M.Raja Rajan, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the third respondent.
2. This writ petition has been filed aggrieved by the proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.02/2026/C.1, dated 09.02.2026, issued by the third respondent, whereby an internal work adjustment has been done by the third respondent within the same Municipality requiring the petitioner to perform the works of free meals, travelling allowances, provident fund, census, election work, maintenance of registers and records of town planning audit instead of holding the post of Accountant and requiring one Mr.S.Selvakumar to work as an Acc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
