Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. Jayachandran, Shamim Ahmed, JJ
P.George Miller – Appellant
Versus
The Tamil Nadu State Human Rights Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. commission found illegal detention and recommended compensation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners denied involvement and jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court upheld detention evidence despite claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. writ dismissed; recovery permitted. (Para 9 , 10) |
(Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.Jayachandran J.)
1. This Writ Petition is filed, challenging the recommendation of the Tamil Nadu State Human Rights Commission, holding that the 2nd Respondent herein, had been illegally detained for three days in connection with a matrimonial dispute and he had been forcibly made to sign a compromise note and to part away about 417 grams of gold.
2. The complaint to the Tamil Nadu State Human Rights Commission was laid by the 2nd Respondent, making the above allegations and further placed on record to show that only after filing of the Habeas Corpus Petition before the High Court in HCP.No. 154 of 2026, the Thiru.Vi.Ka.Nagar Police Station had registered a case against him in Cr.No.248 of 2006, antedating the date of occurrence. The Tamil Nadu State Human Rights Commission, on verifying the records in the light of the complaint, had found that the 2nd Respondent had b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
