Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SRIMATHY, J
P.Victoriah Jasmine Nirmaladevi @ Paul Robert Victoriah – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges patta rejection order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. non-speaking order lacks communicated reasons. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. quash order, remit for fresh hearing. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The present writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the Impugned order of the third Respondent dated 09.03.2026 vide File No.2026/0105/13/001970 and consequently direct the third Respondent to issue the Patta in the name of the petitioner regarding to Survey No.420/5, 420/7 and 420/8, Silukkuvarpatti Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.
2. It is seen from the impugned order that the petitioner's claim for issuance of patta has been rejected on the ground that:-
“NknyOjJ; nghUs;: gll; h khww; k; jpzL; ff; y; (13) khtll; k; epyfN; fhli; l (12) tll; k; rpYfF; thuglb; (032) fpuhkk>; fpuhk Gy vz ; /clg; pupT vz; 420/5> 420/8> y; gll; h khww; k; NfhupaJ njhlug; hf.
ghHit 1. kDjhuu; jpU/jpUkjp/nryt; p Victoria Jemin Nirmaladevi kD ehs;. 19-01-2026 16:41:11
2. rh.M.F.t.mstu; jpU/jpUkjp/nryt; p Ramanathan.M. rpYf;Fthuglb; (032) mwpf;if ehs ; 09-03-2026 17:26:19 ghui; tapy; fzl; jqf; s; gll; h khWjy; Nfhupa kDtpid 20260105/13/001970 fpuhk eput; hf
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
