SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29898

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI, J
K.Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Kavitha, Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Tirupparankunram Taluk, Thirunagar, Madurai District – Respondent
Contempt Petition|W.P.(MD)No.9406 of 2025



Important Points

Compliance with court order averred by petitioner's counsel leads to closure of contempt proceedings.

Subject

Contempt - Civil Contempt

Act Referred

Headnote

The Contempt Petition was filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.9406 of 2025 dated 04.04.2025. The court noted the counsel's statement confirming compliance with the writ order. The court determined no further orders necessary. Issues framed related to compliance with court order. Ratio: Compliance averred by petitioner's counsel suffices to close proceedings. Contempt Petition closed.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.G.Rajaram
For the Respondents: Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

Learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the order in the Writ Petition has been complied with.

2.In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Petition. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top