Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.G.Rajaram
For the Respondents: Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, Additional Government Pleader

Compliance with court order averred by petitioner's counsel leads to closure of contempt proceedings.

Headnote:The Contempt Petition was filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.9406 of 2025 dated 04.04.2025. The court noted the counsel's statement confirming compliance with the writ order. The court determined no further orders necessary. Issues framed related to compliance with court order. Ratio: Compliance averred by petitioner's counsel suffices to close proceedings. Contempt Petition closed.

O R D E R

Learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the order in the Writ Petition has been complied with.

2.In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Petition. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :