IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Samsudeen – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Thoothukudi District. – Respondent
Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.6804 and 6805 of 2026 | C.C.No.538 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir and charge sheet details post facebook upload (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments on limitation and delay admission (Para 3) |
| 3. limitation bar under cr.p.c sections 468,473 (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. charge sheet quashed as time-barred (Para 8) |
ORDER
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner/sole accused in C.C.No.538 of 2025 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruchendur, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioner has been charged for the offence under Section 505(2) of IPC.
2. A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that the petitioner has uploaded Facebook post attacking the sentiments of the other community. The FIR has been registered on 21.11.2018 and charge sheet has been laid on 19.08.2025.
3.According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the maximum punishment that could be imposed for the offence under Section 505(2) of IPC is three years. However, the charge sheet has not been laid within a period of three years and no application was filed by the investigating agency under Section 473 of Cr.P.C seeking extension of time. In such circumstances, charge sheet is liable to be quashed. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent submitted that the charge sheet has not been laid within a period of three years.
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on both side and perused the materials available on record.
6. The petitioner has charged with the offence under Sections
505(2) of IPC and FIR has been registered on 21.11.2018 and charge sheet has been laid on 19.08.2025. The maximum punishment that could be imposed for the offence under Section 505(2) of IPC is three years. As per Section 468(2)(c) of Cr.P.C, charge sheet has to be laid within a period of three years. In the present case, admittedly, no application has been filed by the prosecution under Section 473 of Cr.P.C for extension of time.
7. In such view of the matter, it is clear that the Court cannot take cognizance of this matter beyond three years which is barred by limitation. In such view of the matter if the trial is permitted to continue, it will be only an abuse of process of law.
8. In view of the above said facts, the charge sheet in C.C.No.538 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchendur, is hereby quashed. Consequently, the Criminal original petition is allowed.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
30.03.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No PJL To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchendur.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.