IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J
Tvl Senthil Murugan Fabrik – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) Salem Rural Assessment Circle – Respondent
ORDER
Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the Respondent.
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 30.04.2024, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 28.12.2023 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 30.04.2024.
4. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 24.03.2026.
5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 50% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.
6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:-
“As per the condition imposed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.