Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
K.Ayyappan – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Conservator of Forests (Forest Administration) Panagal Buildings Saidapet Chennai-15 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. notice taken and petition admitted with consent. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. original representation not in records. (Para 5) |
| 3. direct fresh representation for consideration on merits. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
Mr.S.Shaji Bino, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents.
2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
4. This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.03.2025 said to have been submitted by him and to disburse the arrears of salary and pensionary benefits by refixing his salary.
5. However, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the representation said to have been submitted by the petitioner on 10.03.2025 is not available in the records of the respondents and therefore, the question of considering the same does not arise. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner appears to have some grievance with regard to fixation of pay, which has also
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
